Spitfire
1.5-year-old female intact Domestic Short Hair
Spitfire presented to the emergency service at Western Veterinary Specialists and Emergency Centre after an unwitnessed fall from a 7th story balcony. The owners suspect that she fell onto a car and she was then discovered under a vehicle.
On her initial physical exam, her vital parameters were within normal limits. She had a small laceration on the left calcaneus and she had scleral hemorrhage in the left eye. Her neurologic exam identified that she was paraplegic with intact nociception in both pelvic limbs and tail. Her perineal reflexes were intact. Her patellar and withdrawal reflexes were decreased bilaterally. The remainder of the neurologic exam was unremarkable. Based on neurological exam findings a lesion localizing to L4-caudal spinal segments was determined. Primary differential diagnoses for this lesion included a spinal fracture/luxation vs. a traumatic disk extrusion.
A complete blood count, serum biochemistry and full body radiographs were performed. The blood work was consistent with acute inflammatory changes as well as an elevated ALT. This is likely due to muscle trauma and/or hepatic damage associated with the fall.
On survey spinal radiographs there was a comminuted transverse fracture of the spinous process, body and arch of L5 with minimal displacement. The L4-5 intervertebral disk space was narrowed as compared to adjacent sites. The caudal endplate of L4 is also fractured. (Figure 1a and 1b)
Figure 1a
Figure 1b
Figure 1 A and B: Lateral spinal radiograph of the lumbar spine (A) and enlarged L4-5 disk space (B). Note the narrowed disk space and the caudal endplate fracture of L4, as well as the fractures of the spinous process, body and arch of L5 with minimal displacement.
Vertebral fracture and luxations are considered with respect to the three-compartment model of the spine. This model considers the dorsal, middle and ventral compartments of the spine to estimate spinal stability. The dorsal compartment includes the supraspinous ligament, interspinous ligaments, ligamentum flavum, spinous processes, articular processes, laminae and pedicles. The middle compartment includes the dorsal longitudinal ligament, dorsal annulus and the dorsal vertebral body. Finally, the ventral compartment included the remainder of the disk (annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus), vertebral body, and the ventral longitudinal ligament. It is important to understand which portions of the spine are included in each of the compartments, because if two or more compartments are affected, then spinal stabilisation is typically advised. (Figure 2)
Figure 2: Axial image of a normal lumbar vertebra. Red lines indicate the division of the three-compartment model of the vertebral column vertebra on a bone window of a CT scan.
Aside from the three-compartment model of the vertebral column, surgery is also considered for patients with severe neurologic deficits and pain. There are a multitude of ways in which vertebral column fractures can be stabilized. Most commonly, this is accomplished with positive profile threaded pins and bone cement (polymethylmethacrylate - PMMA). Other options would include bone plates, screws and PMMA and external fixators. Medical management of vertebral column fractures may be considered for patients whose fractures are considered stable (ie; less than 2 compartments involved), with no to minimal neurologic deficits and who can be managed effectively on oral pain medications.
Prognosis is determined similarly to patients with intervertebral disk extrusion and is dependent on the findings of the neurologic exam. In patients who have no motor function in the pelvic limbs, it is necessary to test for deep pain sensation (nociception). This is different from the withdrawal reflex and requires a behavioural/physiologic response to having their digit pinched to be considered positive. Behavioural/physiological responses may include trying to bite, looking at the pinched toe, crying out etc.
If they are deep pain positive, there is about an 85% chance that the patient will recover to normal function after surgery. This means we anticipate that they will be able to walk, urinate and defecate normally, as well as live a pain free life. Some residual neurologic deficits may persist. If there is no deep pain, there is a less than 5% chance of the patient walking or maintaining continence. Thus, in cases of deep pain negative spinal fracture/luxation these patients are generally euthanized. It is crucial and important to note these statistics are different from cases of simple intervertebral disk extrusions which generally have a better prognosis; 95% chance of recovery if deep pain remains intact and 50-60% chance of recovery if they are deep pain negative.
Complete assessment of vertebral trauma in dogs currently requires CT and MRI for evaluation of the osseous and soft tissue structures that contribute to vertebral stability. A CT is considered gold standard for spinal fractures as it is reported to be the most sensitive and specific imaging modality to identify and classify the morphology of the osseous vertebral trauma. A major limitation of CT is its ability to assess the parenchyma of the spinal cord and it should be mentioned that MRI is considered the best imaging modality to assess soft tissues, image the extradural, intradural and spinal cord compartments. In clinical cases, due to availability and financial reasons, we often have to make a choice as to which imaging modality is going to be most valuable. For suspected fractures, a spinal CT will most often be performed to document fracture morphology and aid in surgical planning.
In Spitfire’s case, the CT scan identified fractures of the right transverse process at L2, L3 and L5. More importantly a short oblique fracture of the caudal endplate of L4 was seen. Additionally, fractures of the L4-5 facet, the right and left pedicles of L5, and the L5 body and spinous process were noted. Based on CT images, minimal extradural compression of the spinal cord was noted indicating that the most significant portion of her injury was the fracture itself rather than a traumatic disk extrusion. As previously discussed, an MRI of the lumbar spine would be required to fully investigate the relative contribution of a traumatic disk extrusion and the degree of spinal cord swelling. (Figure 3)
Figure 3: Sequential (cranial to caudal) axial CT images of L5 in a bone window.
Yellow arrow: Vertebral body fracture.
Red arrows: Bilateral pedicle fractures
Green arrow: Spinous process fracture
Spitfire was taken to surgery immediately following the CT scan based on instability of the identified spinal fractures (all three compartments affected) and her severe neurologic deficits. The right and left sides of the vertebral column were approached and the L4-5 vertebra were identified. Gross instability was evident at this site. As the fracture was not displaced, reduction was not necessary. One positive profile pin (2.0 mm in diameter) was placed on both the right and left sides of the L4 vertebra. Two pins were also placed into the L6 vertebra, spanning the fractures of the caudal L4 and L5 vertebra. The pins were bent towards each other and the construct was then stabilized by encasing these pins in bone cement. A post-operative CT of the lumbar vertebral column was then performed to ensure the pins were appropriately positioned. The surgical aim is to orient the pins at an angle of 30-60 degrees from the sagittal plane in order to avoid the trauma to the spinal cord and the aorta (Figure 4). Same day, post-operative lumbar spinal radiographs were performed to monitor and trend fracture healing at the 8-week re-check appointment. The surgical repair was deemed acceptable; however, upon evaluation of post-operative CT and radiographic images, the ideal pin depth in the vertebral bodies would be 2 mm shorter (Figure 5). No attempts for surgical revision were made as the risks did not outweigh the benefits of altering pin position.
Figure 4: Post-operative CT scan at the level L4. Soft tissue window with metal suppression algorithm applied to minimize metal streaking artifact. Note the subcutaneous emphysema (yellow) associated with the surgical approach. Red represents the cranial extend of the PMMA. The metal pins (green) in the pedicle and body of the vertebrae. The safe window between spinal cord and aorta in this patient was <1 cm.
Figure 5: Post-operative spinal radiographs. Note the pins in the L4 and L6 vertebra. The pins have been bent towards each other and encased in PMMA to stabilize the vertebral fracture.
Spitfire was paraplegic with intact nociception on her initial neurologic exam. The day following surgery she was mildly improved and considered to be non-ambulatory paraparetic, with stronger motor function on the right pelvic limb. Her reflexes remained decreased. She was discharged to the care of her owners on day 3 post operatively. Two weeks after surgery she was nearly ambulatory and paraparetic (right still better than left) and her spinal reflexes were normal. Her ALT had improved to normal. Given her rapid improvement, she is expected to have a complete recovery. At Spitfire’s 8-week post-operative re-check appointment, in additional to a full physical and neurological exam, repeat lumbar spinal radiographs will be performed to evaluate fracture healing and ensure integrity of the surgical repair. If all is well at that time, she will be allowed to return to normal activity levels.